Sunday, December 20, 2009

Art of Critique: One


Nothing is more crucial than getting a second pair of eyes to look over your manuscript. Many writers can’t afford a professional editor (great special on editing by the way)so they rely on a critique partner or group for help to hone their manuscripts. Yet, there are far too many who believe they can edit their own work, and this is evident by some of the published books reviewed in the last year.

In total honesty, every book should go through an initial reader, and that first reader can and should be a critique partner or group, if you can’t afford an editor.

Here are some of the benefits and musts of joining a critique group or teaming up with another writer to exchange critiques:

A good critique will not change the writer’s voice but suggest ways to improve scenes. When critiquing, never add, “If I was writing this I would…” – instead write, “Suggestion…” and add your comments why you feel that scene/passage needs changing.

A good critique group never bashes. There is no point for hurt feelings. Everyone is trying to help each other and by saying things like, “This sucks.” you are offering nothing but total insult. A better way to express this would be, “This scene didn’t move me because…” and give your reasons along with suggestions how to improve it. A writer won’t understand your ‘insult’ if you are not clear why that scene didn’t work.

As part of a critique group make sure to be objective where your work is concerned. If you are going to argue and explain your reasons for writing that scene you won’t get the full impact of the group. Be polite even if you don’t agree with some of the suggestions, and thank them for their time. Then go over their comments and suggestions and pick and choose what you feel best suits your work. Much better than returning with smart-ass zingers and "I'm going to hunt you down." comments.

When more than one writer suggests a change in the same passage, then be objective where your manuscript is concerned and really look at their comments. They are your first readers, after all, and if they are stumped in a scene imagine the reactions of your buying readers.

Some critiques may contradict others. This is where you need to evaluate each comment and see which, if any, enhances your manuscript.

Remember that not every writer knows the ‘needs’ of a particular genre. For this reason I always suggest to pick the right group or partner who either writes or is an avid reader of that genre.

Stay tuned for more on the art of critique in future posts.

6 comments:

Karen and Robyn - Writing for Children said...

Lea, these are great points. I'm the co-moderator of a children's critique group and as you mention, being part of a critique group is essential part of writing.

Along with the benefits you receive from your members' critiques, you will begin to hone your craft and spot errors easier and quicker in your manuscript and others. It's a win-win situation.

Karen

Carla said...

These are great suggestions. I am an online instructor (contemporary business communication) and most of my students appreciate it when I use this type of critique when it comes to their work.

Carla

J D Webb said...

I try not to take critiques as a personal attack, rather a heads up to let me know where I may have a problem with a word, or thought. I'll analyze what my intention was and compare it to what the critiquer has to say. If I agree I'll make a change. I have the final say. Now with an editor's comments - I value them more and will readily acquiesce.

Katie Hines said...

Left a nice, detailed comment, and it didn't come through. The skinny: my book would not have been published were it not for the critique group I was a part of. It never ceases to amaze me how I miss things that are obvious to others.

Lea Schizas - Author/Editor said...

The major obstacle I see is that many writers still don't understand what being objective about their work means. They need to stand back and truly analyze what their critique partners are saying otherwise they risk stagnating a possible good book to a mediocre finale.

Not every critique is written in stone. The writer must pick and choose based on the value of change it offers to the manuscript.

Be defensive and you lose the advantage of a good critique partner or group.

kanishk said...

you will begin to hone your craft and spot errors easier and quicker in your manuscript and others. It's a win-win situation.

Work from home India